How EMS currents work: with and without a conductor

EMS is one of those technologies that sounds dry and technical on paper, but becomes instantly clear the moment you feel it on your skin. Barely noticeable impulses, gentle muscle contractions — and suddenly you realize: this is not a “cream with an effect,” this is mechanics. Here, work with tone happens not through beautiful promises, but through physiology.

The principle is simple: the device delivers electrical impulses, they activate neuromuscular fibers, and the muscle responds with a contraction. That’s exactly why EMS is loved in home care: it creates a feeling of a more “collected” face, improved tone, and a more defined contour — especially when treatments become regular.

Now to the most interesting part: why does one device require a gel or at least water, while another works “dry” and you still feel the microcurrents? The answer lies in the fact that the skin is not designed to conduct electricity perfectly. Its outer layer is a protective barrier that keeps moisture inside and blocks excess from the outside. That’s why, when the skin is dry, an electrical impulse may be transmitted unevenly: weaker in some areas, sharper in others, and sometimes almost imperceptible. Not because the device is “bad,” but because this is how the skin barrier works.

This is exactly why a conductor exists. Gel or water reduces excess resistance and makes contact stable. The impulse is distributed evenly, sensations become softer, and stimulation more predictable. It’s like the difference between gliding over dry skin and well-conditioned skin: the movement is different, the control is different, the comfort is different.

A conductor provides more even, comfortable, and deeper performance. When the skin is well moisturized with gel or water, the electrical impulse passes more stably with fewer surface losses, allowing the device to deliver the signal to muscle structures more effectively. In this mode, stimulation feels less like pinpoint tingling and more like controlled muscle work: more uniform, gentle, yet distinct. That’s why protocols with a conductor usually deliver a stronger toning and lifting effect, especially when used as a regular course.

Another important point is which muscles are activated. In the facial area, EMS most often activates the muscles of the lower third, responsible for contour definition, cheek tone, and the chin area, as well as the muscles around the mouth — where loss of firmness tends to appear earlier with age. That’s why after proper stimulation, the face looks more “collected,” and the contours appear more refined.

But the Japanese, as always, went further. At the exhibition, I saw new devices, including an illuminated comb where microcurrents are felt even without gel. This is not a trick or “higher power.” It’s an engineering approach: a different contact surface, a different signal delivery, a different logic of interaction with the skin. Such a device creates noticeable stimulation without preparation, which fits perfectly into a home routine when you want to do a treatment quickly — in the morning or in the evening — without extra steps.

The sensations can differ as well. EMS without a conductor often feels more delicate or more point-focused, depending on the area and skin sensitivity. This format is ideal for regular tone maintenance: when you’re not “doing a procedure once a week,” but simply adding it to your life as a habit. And this is often what delivers the best results in home care — not one-time intensity, but consistency over time.

So the difference between EMS with and without a conductor is not about one option being right and the other wrong. It’s about two usage styles. A conductor provides more even, comfortable, and deeper performance. The “dry” mode is fast, simple, and extremely convenient for daily toning. And once you understand this, choosing a device becomes much easier: you’re not choosing what’s “trendiest,” but what will truly fit into your routine and work regularly.

SUSIJĘS STRAIPSNIAI